Egypt: From revolution to evolution

By Khaled Diab

Egypt's next president is likely to be against the revolution, so revolutionaries must forge a viable opposition and push for social and economic change.

Friday 15 June 2012

The culmination of the race for the Egyptian should be a proud moment for Egypt, yet paradoxically the country's nascent democratic process has delivered an apparently anti-democratic outcome.

Although Egyptians are finally getting the unprecedented opportunity to pick their next leader, voters now have the unenviable dilemma of choosing between an anti-revolutionary, neo-liberal military man () and a counterrevolutionary, neo-liberal Islamist ().

This has left revolutionaries and supporters of the revolution in a double bind: participate and effectively vote against the revolution or boycott the and potentially undermine the democratic process you have been advocating.

Like Odysseus, Egypt's revolutionaries have to find a way to navigate, without shipwrecking the revolution, between the multi-headed Scylla that symbolises the remnants of the regime and the mysterious and treacherous depths of the whirlpool-inducing Charybdis of the Muslim Brotherhood.

One way of circumnavigating these two perils is to boycott the runoff elections, as many activists and some of the defeated candidates have been urging, in order to show that neither Mursi nor Shafiq enjoy a real mandate. As one protester on put it, “It does not make sense to choose between two wrongs.”

One effective and creative way of doing this would be to turn up at the voting stations anyway and cast a spoilt ballot – say by writing “Mickey Mouse for president” on their ballot paper. If the number of invalid, or Mickey Mouse, votes outnumber those for Shafiq and Mursi, this would be a powerful message to Egypt's future president that a Disney character enjoys more support than him.

While people have the right not to vote, such a course of action does involve certain risks. First and foremost, it enables opponents of the revolution to continue the long smear campaign against Egypt's revolutionaries by suggesting that the boycott is undemocratic and motivated not by principle but by spite.

Pointing to the abuses committed during the transitional period, the unclear powers of the next president and the murky backstage role the junta will play once it officially hands over power, many revolutionaries have become so disillusioned that they plan to shun the entire political process and continue their struggle on the streets.

But this would be a grave error. While there will be a need for the protest-oriented ‘democracy of Tahrir' for many years to come, the revolution should continue by all means possible – and that includes becoming part of the political process, imperfect as it may be.

Although the generals loaded the dice against the revolutionaries from the start, that was not the only reason behind their poor showing in both the parliamentary and presidential races. The low turnout, of around 47%, for the unique spectacle of 13 men vying for Egypt's hitherto unavailable top job was effectively a vote of little-to-no confidence in all the candidates.

This failure to inspire is partly a result of the absence of inspiring leaders in the new electoral political brought about by decades of repressive rule, but it is also due to the disarray and fragmentation of the revolutionary movement.

For example, on Tuesday, I read that the 6 April Youth Movement, one of the main driving forces behind the revolution, was backing Mursi's candidacy after the Islamist candidate had signed on to a ‘National Consensus Document' and promised to appoint a vice-president who was not connected to the Brotherhood.

The very next day, I read that 6 April was calling for a boycott of the presidential election. Had the young revolutionaries changed their mind so quickly or was this some mistake? Neither, as it turns out. The first announcement was made by the so-called ‘Ahmed Maher Front', led by one of the group's co-founders, while the second was released by a splinter group known as the ‘Democratic Front'.

Instead of this infighting and political intrigue, Egypt's progressive, secular revolutionary forces need to find a way to consolidate themselves and forge a viable opposition to the well-organised and disciplined Islamists over the coming four years if they are to stand a chance at the next election.

In addition, the is not just a political one, but is also social, cultural and economic. This is recognised in the revolutionary slogan of ‘bread, freedom and social justice', but has not been acted upon sufficiently, except rather sporadically at the local level, mainly by workers and trade unions.

If more ordinary Egyptians are to be won over to the cause of the revolution, they need to be persuaded that there is something in it for them, that it can deliver them social and . Beyond this, creating a secular, liberal, tolerant and egalitarian society requires the removal of ignorance through decent education, and the combating of , nepotism, patronage and the that bedevils Egyptian society not just at the top of the pyramid, but at almost every stratum.

Part of the Muslim Brotherhood's success can be traced back to more than 80 years of nationwide grassroots social and cultural activism and charitable work. Secularists can learn, and are learning, a lot from the Brotherhood about instigating change from the bottom, up. Egypt does not just need revolution, it also need gradual evolution.

Note: Since this article was written, the Supreme Constitutional Court has dissolved the Egyptian parliament, which has been described by some as a “military coup” and raises worrying questions about exactly how much power the generals truly intend to hand over and whether this ill-conceived decision could spiral out of control and lead to instability and bloodshed. This verdict appears to be politically motivated, which not only undermines the Egyptian judiciaries hard-earned credibility but is also bound to boost the Islamists' flagging popularity by transforming them into martyrs of political injustice.

This is an extended version of an article which appeared in The National on 15 June 2012.


For more insights

Sign up to receive the latest from The Chronikler

We don't spam!

For more insights

Sign up to receive the latest from The Chronikler

We don't spam!

3 thoughts on “Egypt: From revolution to evolution

  • The US and their zionist proxies are working overtime to re-define democracy and revolution in Egypt. It only sends a signal to Egyptians that there is no room for complacency. They have to be continuously vigilant against the US and zionist backed counter revolutionaries who will try novel ways of staying relevant in Egypt and in the region.

  • Standards of LIFE

    Great article. Thank you for the clarity of perspective and exhortation to common sense.

  • بني وطني ، ، ، لقد أثبت الشعب المصري أن الأغبياء فقط هم من يستهينون بعقله و ذكاؤه ، ، أرجوكم تنبهوا للإنجاز العظيم الذي حققه المصريين في المرحلة الأولي من الإنتخابات ولابد أن نستكمله في المرحلة القادمة بنفس النجاح والقوة “لننقذ” سي…ناء الغالية و “لنسقط” الإخوان والقاعدة والجهاد وحماس وحرس إيران الثوري وقطروالعملاء والأمريكان وخطة الشيطان المسماه بالفوضي الخلاقة ، ،سنسقط إن شاء الله ‘مرسي’ الذي يقول أنه خليفة الفاتح عمرو إبن العاص ، ،المسألة ليست شفيق أو حمدين أو عمرو موسي ولكنها معركة إستعادة مصر وضرب المخطط الأمريكي الصهيوني في قلبه ، ، ،اللهم إحم مصر لكل المصريين


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Enjoyed your visit? Please spread the word