<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building intolerance in Switzerland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chronikler.com/europe/multiculturalism/minaret-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chronikler.com</link>
	<description>Byte-sized muse and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KhaledDiab</title>
		<link>http://chronikler.com/europe/multiculturalism/minaret-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>KhaledDiab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chronikler.com/?page_id=1223#comment-168</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Johan: &quot;is about forging a public sentiment that tolerance should have its limits. And that is dangerous.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Well expressed! Let&#039;s hope tolerance wins out in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Johan: &#8220;is about forging a public sentiment that tolerance should have its limits. And that is dangerous.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well expressed! Let&#8217;s hope tolerance wins out in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://chronikler.com/europe/multiculturalism/minaret-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chronikler.com/?page_id=1223#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I agree Johan, referenda rarely result in a refined consensus of a people&#039;s wishes. The alternative? Public debate is all good and well but it&#039;s easy to ignore. Moderates (Declan) only dare to speak up when their comfy life or status quo is endangered. What would it take to stir that up?
(-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Johan, referenda rarely result in a refined consensus of a people&#8217;s wishes. The alternative? Public debate is all good and well but it&#8217;s easy to ignore. Moderates (Declan) only dare to speak up when their comfy life or status quo is endangered. What would it take to stir that up?<br />
(-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://chronikler.com/europe/multiculturalism/minaret-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chronikler.com/?page_id=1223#comment-152</guid>
		<description>When the church bells chime, I cannot see a muslim complain about it. This whole referendum is not about minarets, they are completely harmless. But it is about forging a public sentiment that tolerance should have its limits. And that is dangerous. In that case, you need a open discussion in Switzerland with Muslims and the Swiss about freedom of religion. Now, I see no debate from two sides, but just a yes/no vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the church bells chime, I cannot see a muslim complain about it. This whole referendum is not about minarets, they are completely harmless. But it is about forging a public sentiment that tolerance should have its limits. And that is dangerous. In that case, you need a open discussion in Switzerland with Muslims and the Swiss about freedom of religion. Now, I see no debate from two sides, but just a yes/no vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
